Canadian High Commissioner to Guyana, Sébastien Sigouin, today said he will continue to engage all stakeholders and continue his country’s longstanding support for democratic governance, human rights and the rule of law.
Earlier this week, the High Commissioner met with the leader and Senior Members of the WIN party. A brief Statement from WIN said they met with the Canadian Envoy and discussed issues of mutual interest, including democratic governance, constitutional processes, and the functioning of Parliament.
The High Commissioner had also earlier called for the election of the Leader of the Opposition.
Following the meeting this week with the WIN leader, speculations swirled on social media suggesting that the High Commissioner is supporting Mr. Mohamed.
While not directly addressing that speculation, the High Commissioner in a Social Media post today made it clear that engagement does not amount to endorsement.
“Engagement does not imply endorsement; it reflects a genuine commitment to dialogue and to institutions. Canada’s approach has always been guided by respect: respect for sovereignty, for constitutional processes, and for the principle that strong institutions are essential to a resilient democracy. These principles will continue to guide my work, and the approach of the country I have the privilege to represent,” the High Commissioner said.
Mr. Sigouin said his role as the Canadian High Commissioner is to engage with a wide range of actors across society — government, opposition figures, civil society, the private sector, and communities and he will continue to do so.
He said this is because of his longstanding support for democratic governance, human rights and the rule of law.
He noted that in recent weeks there has been renewed public discussion in Guyana about the role of Parliament.
The High Commissioner has expressed his belief that Parliament is a cornerstone of democracy and a place where accountability is exercised, differing views are expressed peacefully, and the interests of citizens are debated through constitutional means.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login